Naming the Baby

Don Box's Spoutlet

Syndication

I've been working on "Oslo" for quite a while now.

 

Like "Oslo" itself, several of the major pieces of "Oslo" have placeholder code names that will be replaced with the actual names we'll brand the product with.

 

This makes writing titles and abstracts for PDC talks especially challenging. We can't use the internal code names, because they're not long for this world.

 

We also can't use the actual product names, because we don't have a vetted set of names. Even if we did, the marketing and PR folks want to do the "reveal" in a newsworthy session or keynote, not in a random update to the PDC registration page.

 

That means that the titles and abstract have to use vague adjective-laden terms, which is surprisingly hard to make sound understandable let alone compelling enough to want to attend.

 

For example, rather than just using a title like "Foo" Under The Hood or Programming "Bar", we wind up writing things like The Tool for Writing Declarative Applications Under The Hood or Programming a Framework for REST Information Retrieval and Update.

FWIW, this is standard operating procedure - we had the same challenge in 03 with WCF and in 05 with LINQ and WF.

 

With "Oslo" its harder, as there are several significant (and separable) technologies (so we have more names to come up with) and we've not yet found the right terminology/adjectives that efficiently convey what we're doing. 

 

I can give a pretty accurate picture of "Oslo" if I have five minutes to talk or 1000 words to write - we still haven't found the perfect meme.

 

Fun times.

 


Posted Jul 03 2008, 11:57 PM by don-box
Filed under: ,

Comments

Jarle Nygård wrote re: Naming the Baby
on 07-04-2008 2:47 AM

Looking forward to hearing more about Oslo, it'll be interesting to see where Microsoft can take it. :)

Peter Shrosbree wrote re: Naming the Baby
on 07-04-2008 4:25 AM

So give us the 1,000 words! You put in a quarter of the required effort in this post.

:)

M. David Peterson wrote re: Naming the Baby
on 07-04-2008 5:31 AM

How about naming it "M. David"?  You know, after me. :-)

Okay, okay.  So maybe the baby would likely find the first rope it could find after realizing who it was named after.  Then again, maybe we could get away without telling it anything.  

You never know.  It might work. ;-)

Or, wait!  Stewart's a nice name.  You could name it Stewart!  (Do it!  I dare you. ;-)

M. David Peterson wrote re: Naming the Baby
on 07-04-2008 5:33 AM

s/maybe the baby would likely find/maybe the baby would likely use/

qwr wrote re: Naming the Baby
on 07-04-2008 1:13 PM

How about: Poor Man .NET Google :-)

M. David Peterson wrote re: Naming the Baby
on 07-04-2008 3:59 PM

You know what'd be cool about naming it Stewart?  Instead of talk titles like "'Foo' Under The Hood" you could use something a bit more snappy.  For example, "Boogie with Stu" for an introduction and overview type talk.  Or an evangelist could get *really* creative, add a three legged stool as a prop, and use the title "Stu, and You, and Me Makes Three" as a way of showing how that even one missing leg on the stool leaves you unbalanced as a developer.  Or you could combine them together, add a "Developers, Developers, Developers!" dance from Ballmer, and call the end result "Boogie with Steve"!

The possibilities are endless! ;-)

Simon Zambrovski | What is OSLO? wrote Simon Zambrovski | What is OSLO?
on 09-21-2008 6:20 PM

Pingback from  Simon Zambrovski | What is OSLO?

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?